Special treatment for catholics?
As reported in The Independent on Sunday on 21 January 2007, the news that the catholic church is pressing the British government to allow an exeption to the recently passed anti-discrimination law regarding sexuality has reached the mainstream media (BBC, The Times).
At the moment, only Ruth Kelly and the prime minister, Tony Blair, are supportive of the catholics’ attempt to change the law to their own demands. Kelly is a known catholic, and Blair is a catholic supporter (his wife, Cherie Booth, is a catholic) and has had meetings with both the currrent pope and his predecessor. Blair, it is thought, is expected to convert to catholicism after he leaves government office.
As I noted previously, Ruth Kelly, the Secretary of State for Communities, is hardly the best person to represent those who are discriminated against, especially considering that she a) is a strict catholic (and probably a member of Opus Dei); b) has abstained from every single major vote on homosexual rights.
Today I learned that, not only is the government considering relenting to the demands of the catholics to allow them (and only them) to legally express their bigotry but, that this government is attempting to subvert the welfare support system by actively promoting religious-welfare programmes (source: DWP).
So, what does this mean?
At the moment, the catholics are attempting to get an exemption to anti-discrimination legislation, which would allow them to refuse to accept adoption requests from homosexual couples.
The Department of Work and Pensions is aiming to promote religious supply of more mainstream welfare services (of which adoption is already one) such as support for the homeless, etc.
Mr Murphy announced he was hosting a national seminar in the coming weeks that will bring together faith organisations of all persuasions to discuss how they could contribute further to the welfare state and what more the Government can do to facilitate this.DWP press release
If this exemption goes through, and the government funds religious groups to offer state-sponsored welfare programmes, what is to stop the catholic church (or any other church) from further demanding extra exemptions for these programmes? The precedent would already have been set, and it would be more difficult (legally) to turn back the clock.
What this would amount to would be the Vatican dictating public policy, determining how the welfare infrastructure of Britain would be run. It would also allow for any special interest group to assert that they too are also eligible for special treatment.
I fear having our government policy, and hence our legal, economic and welfare systems being dictated to from the Vatican or by the whims of any other group. If I wanted to live in a theocracy, I’d move to one.
Possibly related posts:
- It’s *still* a fucking cracker, or how some catholics are just fucking arseholes ...
- The Telegraph: Muslim sex offenders may opt out of treatment ...
- All Roman Catholics Go To Heaven ...
- One for UK catholics, perhaps? ...
- Catholics get 20 months leeway on adoption ...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tags: BBC News, bigotry, catholicism, government and politics, homophobia, media, news, Ruth Kelly, special treatment/religious privilege, The Independent, The Times, Tony Blair, UK
Comments
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
43One Responsehttp://www.nullifidian.net/2007/01/23/special-treatment-for-catholics/Special+treatment+for+catholics%3F2007-01-23+21%3A59%3A54nullifidian to “Special treatment for catholics?”
Blogroll (UK)
Blogroll
- Adult Christianity
- An Apostate’s Chapel
- Atheist Ethicist
- Atheist Hussy
- Atheist Media
- Atheist Perspective
- Atheist Revolution
- Bad Astronomy
- BEEP! BEEP! IT’S ME.
- Black Sun Journal
- Bligbi
- Canterbuty Atheists
- Chicken Girl
- Daylight Atheism
- Deep Thoughts
- Dwindling in Unbelief
- evanescent
- Evolution Space
- Evolved and Rat/i/onal
- Five Public Opinions
- Friendly Atheist
- Geoff Arnold
- Happy Jihad’s House of Pancakes
- Homosecular Gaytheist [and friends]
- Honjii’s Harangues
- Humanist Dad
- Irreligiosity
- Kazim’s Korner
- lol god
- LOLgod
- Lord J-Bar For Democracy, Not Theocracy
- No More Hornets
- One Good Move
- Oz Atheist’s Weblog
- Pharyngula
- Pooflingers Anonymous
- Possummomma (aka, Atheist in a mini van)
- Religion *is* a problem
- Saint Gasoline
- Sandwalk
- Sean the Blogonaut (new URL)
- See Mike Draw
- Sexy Secularist!
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Splendid Elles
- Stuff God Hates
- Stupid Dinosaur Lies
- The Atheist Experience
- The Atheist Jew
- The Barefoot Bum
- The Flying Trilobite
- The Iron Chariot
- The Perplexed Observer
- The Religion Virus
- The Uncredible Hallq
- toomanytribbles
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- Velocity Inversion
- Way of the Mind
- Wrong In Their Mind Tanks
Good Stuff
- Atheist Blogs Aggregated
- Center for Inquiry
- Centre for Inquiry
- Does God Exist?
- Encyclopedia of Life
- Fundies Say The Darndest Things!
- God Checker
- Humanist Society of Scotland
- Iron Chariots
- James Randi Educational Foundation
- Michael Shermer
- New England Skeptical Society
- Pat Condell’s Godless Comedy
- Planet Atheism
- Planet Humanism
- Robert M Price
- Sam Harris
- Science/AAAS
- Talk.Origins
- The Brights
- The Official God FAQ
- The RDF
- The Reason Project
- The Rejection of Pascal’s Wager
- The Science Network
Petitions
Petitions (closed)
- [failed] Abolish Faith Schools (UK)
- [failed] Ban Promotion of Faith in State Schools
- [failed] End Faith Schools
- [failed] Rename The ‘Church’ of Scientology under section 32 of the Companies Act
- [failed] Secularise the UK
- [failed] Tax Churches
- [ignored] Refuse state funding of church maintenance
- [partial success] Ban the usage of Narconon in any publicly funded orgianisation
- [partial success] Stop Islamic Sharia Law being used in Great Britain
- [partial success] Stop misleading advertising by religious groups
- [success] Recognise Atheists
- [success] Remove Creationist Literature from State Schools
-
Twitter
-
Chat
Join nullifidian on IRC in #atheism at blitzed.org or use the chat right here
Or head on over to Secular Chat.
-
Feeds
-
Current readers
-
Recently played
-
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Tags
- activism
- advertising
- anti-atheism
- anti-science
- Arkell v. Pressdram
- atheism
- atheist bus
- bad arguments/logical fallacies
- BBC
- BBC News
- bible
- bigotry
- blasphemy
- blog
- books
- British Humanist Association
- cartoon
- catholicism
- Charles Darwin
- chart
- christianity
- Christian Voice
- creationism/intelligent design
- culture
- demotivation
- dogma
- Edinburgh
- education
- employment
- entertainment
- evidence
- evolution
- evolution denial
- FAIL!
- faith/belief
- free speech
- fundamentalism
- government and politics
- government and politics
- homophobia
- homosexuality
- humanism
- humour
- hypocrisy
- I demand respect!
- image
- islam
- Jerry Springer:The Opera
- legal
- letters
- literalism
- LOL
- lying for Jesus
- media
- medicine and healthcare
- medicine and healthcare
- Mohammed
- news
- nullifidian.net
- opinion
- persecution complex
- personal
- petition
- photo
- Photoshop
- prayer
- quote
- Ray "Tampon Case/Banana Man" Comfort
- reality
- religion
- response
- Richard Dawkins
- Sam Harris
- scepticism
- science
- Scotland
- scripture
- secularism
- special treatment/religious privilege
- special treatment/religious privilege
- Stephen "Birdshit" Green
- superstition
- taking the piss
- technology
- television
- the arts
- The Guardian
- The Independent
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- The Stupid It Burns
- The Telegraph
- The Times
- thought
- UK
- USA
- video
- web
- WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
- woo woo
-
Archives
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006










[...] which can be suitably rejected when we have the prime example of these people claiming that they should be allowed to discriminate against homosexuals because it’s their tradition, or their scripture tells them, to do so. Their [...]