UK government recognises atheism
A petition was recently put on the 10 Downing Street web site with the following wording:
A large part of britain’s (sic) society is made up of secular atheists. However, when referendums and debates are taking place, there is hardly ever a representative of humanist views for example, meaning that many people’s values are not being appreciated, in favour of religious ones. I only ask that Atheist ethics are given fair and preportional (sic) representation in the consideration of legislation.
We also ask that legeslation (sic) protecting religious views from attack, are equally applied to atheism and that remarks such as “Atheists are immoral” are treated in the same way as if ‘Atheists’ was replaced with ‘Jews’, ‘Muslims’ or ‘Christians’.
The government’s office today responded with the following announcement:
The Government respects the right of all citizens to freedom of belief, thought and expression. The moral and ethical values which underpin Humanism make an important contribution to British society. It is important that the diverse perspectives and needs of all communities are reflected in government policy, without excluding the shared values which underpin cohesive communities.
There are occasions when Government has conducted consultation exercises with faith communities, where there has been a specific relevance to faith related issues, or where a faith based perspective has been required. However, it continues to be a priority of Government to ensure that those without a faith perspective are also able to participate in constructive debate on a range of policy issues and to inform the development of legislation. The experiences which exist within the wide range of Atheist, Humanist and other secularist organisations make them key partners of Government and integral to the process of developing and implementing social policy.
Recent legislation countering racial and religious hatred only bans material or conduct which is threatening, and only if it is intended to stir up hatred of a group defined by its religion or belief. The right to freedom of speech, including robust debate and satirical comment, is safeguarded.
Which is nice.
No other posts are likely to be like this.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tags: no tags
Comments
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
1215 Responseshttp://www.nullifidian.net/2007/03/16/uk-government-recognises-atheism/UK+government+recognises+atheism2007-03-16+19%3A02%3A32nullifidian to “UK government recognises atheism”
Blogroll (UK)
Blogroll
- Adult Christianity
- An Apostate’s Chapel
- Atheist Ethicist
- Atheist Hussy
- Atheist Media
- Atheist Perspective
- Atheist Revolution
- Bad Astronomy
- BEEP! BEEP! IT’S ME.
- Black Sun Journal
- Bligbi
- Canterbuty Atheists
- Chicken Girl
- Daylight Atheism
- Deep Thoughts
- Dwindling in Unbelief
- evanescent
- Evolution Space
- Evolved and Rat/i/onal
- Five Public Opinions
- Friendly Atheist
- Geoff Arnold
- Happy Jihad’s House of Pancakes
- Homosecular Gaytheist [and friends]
- Honjii’s Harangues
- Humanist Dad
- Irreligiosity
- Kazim’s Korner
- lol god
- LOLgod
- Lord J-Bar For Democracy, Not Theocracy
- No More Hornets
- One Good Move
- Oz Atheist’s Weblog
- Pharyngula
- Pooflingers Anonymous
- Possummomma (aka, Atheist in a mini van)
- Religion *is* a problem
- Saint Gasoline
- Sandwalk
- Sean the Blogonaut (new URL)
- See Mike Draw
- Sexy Secularist!
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Splendid Elles
- Stuff God Hates
- Stupid Dinosaur Lies
- The Atheist Experience
- The Atheist Jew
- The Barefoot Bum
- The Flying Trilobite
- The Iron Chariot
- The Perplexed Observer
- The Religion Virus
- The Uncredible Hallq
- toomanytribbles
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- Velocity Inversion
- Way of the Mind
- Wrong In Their Mind Tanks
Good Stuff
- Atheist Blogs Aggregated
- Center for Inquiry
- Centre for Inquiry
- Does God Exist?
- Encyclopedia of Life
- Fundies Say The Darndest Things!
- God Checker
- Humanist Society of Scotland
- Iron Chariots
- James Randi Educational Foundation
- Michael Shermer
- New England Skeptical Society
- Pat Condell’s Godless Comedy
- Planet Atheism
- Planet Humanism
- Robert M Price
- Sam Harris
- Science/AAAS
- Talk.Origins
- The Brights
- The Official God FAQ
- The RDF
- The Reason Project
- The Rejection of Pascal’s Wager
- The Science Network
Petitions
Petitions (closed)
- [failed] Abolish Faith Schools (UK)
- [failed] Ban Promotion of Faith in State Schools
- [failed] End Faith Schools
- [failed] Rename The ‘Church’ of Scientology under section 32 of the Companies Act
- [failed] Secularise the UK
- [failed] Tax Churches
- [ignored] Refuse state funding of church maintenance
- [partial success] Ban the usage of Narconon in any publicly funded orgianisation
- [partial success] Stop Islamic Sharia Law being used in Great Britain
- [partial success] Stop misleading advertising by religious groups
- [success] Recognise Atheists
- [success] Remove Creationist Literature from State Schools
-
Twitter
-
Chat
Join nullifidian on IRC in #atheism at blitzed.org or use the chat right here
Or head on over to Secular Chat.
-
Feeds
-
Current readers
-
Recently played
-
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Tags
- activism
- advertising
- anti-atheism
- anti-science
- Arkell v. Pressdram
- atheism
- atheist bus
- bad arguments/logical fallacies
- BBC
- BBC News
- bible
- bigotry
- blasphemy
- blog
- books
- British Humanist Association
- cartoon
- catholicism
- Charles Darwin
- chart
- christianity
- Christian Voice
- creationism/intelligent design
- culture
- demotivation
- dogma
- Edinburgh
- education
- employment
- entertainment
- evidence
- evolution
- evolution denial
- FAIL!
- faith/belief
- free speech
- fundamentalism
- government and politics
- government and politics
- homophobia
- homosexuality
- humanism
- humour
- hypocrisy
- I demand respect!
- image
- islam
- Jerry Springer:The Opera
- legal
- letters
- literalism
- LOL
- lying for Jesus
- media
- medicine and healthcare
- medicine and healthcare
- Mohammed
- news
- nullifidian.net
- opinion
- persecution complex
- personal
- petition
- photo
- Photoshop
- prayer
- quote
- Ray "Tampon Case/Banana Man" Comfort
- reality
- religion
- response
- Richard Dawkins
- Sam Harris
- scepticism
- science
- Scotland
- scripture
- secularism
- special treatment/religious privilege
- special treatment/religious privilege
- Stephen "Birdshit" Green
- superstition
- taking the piss
- technology
- television
- the arts
- The Guardian
- The Independent
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- The Stupid It Burns
- The Telegraph
- The Times
- thought
- UK
- USA
- video
- web
- WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
- woo woo
-
Archives
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006










[...] UK citizens only.) Further to my previous post about the government recognising the value that the non-religious have in the UK, and for those of you who haven’t seen these before, we need your voices to add to the chorus [...]
I wonder if:
Means that Theists would be punished for stirring up hatred of Atheists. Does a lack of religion count as a “religion or belief?”
It will be interesting to see how this announcement stands the test of time.
I guess a “lack of belief” is counted as a meta-belief for the sake of this legislation, although a court case is, of course, the acid test.
I suppose, for the government to be able to take action against the mad-rag-heads who spout their vile shit against anyone that’s not a muslim, the “belief” in question has to be “not believing in allah” or something equally vague.
well said. Also it is nice to see that the government do sometimes respond to the petitions in a positive manner (as opposed to the ID card response which was basically – “we dont care how many of you signed to say it is a crazy idea, we are doing it”).
So very true. To be honest, I’d rather see that pack of jokers that make up the Respect party in government than see the current Labour rat-bags extend their term to carry the idiocy and lies that ID cards represent.
Oh, and thanks for reposting the petitions, the more the merrier! :-)