The Times: How dare you call me a fundamentalist

I didn’t pick up The Times over the past week as I’ve was incredibly busy. If I had, I might been aware of this opinion piece by Richard Dawkins, who takes general forms of the criticisms that have been levied at him since publishing The God Delusion and answers them individually.

Here’s an example of one of his replies, which echoes many of my thoughts of the purpose of The God Delusion:

You ignore the best of religion and instead . . . “you attack crude, rabble-rousing chancers like Ted Haggard, Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, rather than facing up to sophisticated theologians like Bonhoeffer or the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

If subtle, nuanced religion predominated, the world would be a better place and I would have written a different book. The melancholy truth is that decent, understated religion is numerically negligible. Most believers echo Robertson, Falwell or Haggard, Osama bin Laden or Ayatollah Khomeini. These are not straw men. The world needs to face them, and my book does so.
Richard Dawkins

You can read the full article over at The Times.

Note: the attribution at the foot of The Times‘ article leads me to believe that this may be included in a fore- or afterword in the paperback edition of The God Delusion, which is out on the 21st May.

/hattip to Æsahættr for alerting me to this.

Scientology & Me: Sweeney responds

BBC Panorama: Scientology & Me

Encyclopedia of Life

10 May 2007 · Comments Off 

The Enemies of Reason

Ray Comfort’s proof of a god without the bible

BBC: Holy bullshit

The Times: Religion-free education in UK may be made illegal

Questions for readers and site updates

The scale of knowledge

6 May 2007 · Comments Off 

Review of ‘The Dawkins Delusion?’

“If black is a color, then Atheism is a religion”

« Previous Page

There's probably no god.  Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.