Conversation with a serial blogwhore

Well, that was interesting. Here’s a transcript of a conversation between myself and self-proclaimed “anti-Darwinist” and serial blogwhore1 John A Davison (that’s “John A Davison”, damnit!), which he “threatened” to publish if I cared to respond. I don’t care to respond further to such an agressive posturing arsehole, so I’m publishing it myself here for the edification of anybody who is having the same conversation with John A Davison yet hasn’t prematurely concluded it.

All emails are verbatim, although I have removed the previous reply quoting for brevity.

I obviously touched a nerve with my last response, seeing as he’s now reduced to the schoolyard tactic of name-calling:

What a loon. As I really don’t care to respond — not because I’m wary of his threat - obviously, seeing as I’m posting this here — I’m simply going to quickly fisk his last blurtation and ignore him henceforth:

I do not invite people randomly. I invite my adversaries.

We’re adversaries? I didn’t even know that we’d met. If we have, I must apologise for not having noticed you.

Cowards that they all are, they refuse to respond.

I’ve responded, so I can’t assume that you’re talking about me here.

Don’t answer this email because, if you do, I may reproduce the whole exchange as an example of what is wrong with internet (sic) communication.

How odd. As far as I can see, I’ve received all of your email contributions. There doesn’t appear to be anything wrong with Internet communication in this case.

Trust me.

Hardly.

I have no respect for you whatsoever.

Am I bovvered?

Really, what makes you think that I value your opinion at all?

Got that?

Yes. I still don’t give a shit.

Write that down.

If you give me a valid reason, I may acquiesce to your demand. Otherwise, “no”.

Thanks for exposing yourself as just one more mindless anonymous inconsequential blowhard.

And this is me you’re talking about here? Aside from the obvious falsity of the word “anonymous” (although you do appear to be overcompensating somewhat) you seem to be suffering from a classic case of projection. That must play havoc when you look in a mirror.

So, having found my email address on the Internet, John A Davison now has a bit more of the publicity he so obviously craves. Somehow I doubt it will win him any more friends, but he’s now. And now I am the proud owner of a brand new “adversary”. Aren’t I special? :-)

The only thing I’m grateful for is that, in wasting my time, he didn’t go mad, as he usually does, in spewing forth endless quote like a true logomaniac.

Oh, and if you are John A Davison reading this, then feel free to comment or spew your tedious vitriol: but I repeat myself… I can’t say that I’ll reply, but at least you’ll leave something more of your legacy, which is all you want, isn’t it?

And, for amusement, John A Davison orders a pizza.

  1. lately here, although I expect that to last as long as his previous efforts []

10 Responses to “Conversation with a serial blogwhore”

  1. TW Says:

    Great to see you back!

    One thing I remember from the days when USENET was still usable is that trolls, nutters, cranks and kooks make a massive deal about getting people to identify themselves. It is a huge fallacy and, largely is just a delaying tactic while the crank comes up with something else (usually a load of ad hominems or false appeals to authority).

    It is a shame (*) to see John A Davidson doing the same.

    (*) and by shame, I mean not a shame but really funny and sadly predictable.

  2. Reed Braden Says:

    You’re back! Good to see you on the interwebnetz again. Are we going to get a post about why you were missing for so long?

  3. Brock Says:

    I don’t think I’m reading the same blogs as the cool kids, because I don’t think I’ve ever even heard of this guy. Did I miss the opening salvo here, or did he just come out of left field to harass you?

  4. nullifidian Says:

    @TW:

    Cheers, fella! :-) John A Davison seems to think that I might be swayed by his appeals to (supposed) authority. I’m not sure if I made it clear enough that that wasn’t the case. ;-)

    He seems to be under the rather interesting delusion that having his name, which is John A Davison by the way, plastered all over the web will ensure that he has a legacy for future generations to fawn over. Time will tell, but I suspect not - even within his own lifetime, John A Davison doesn’t even have the notability for a Wikipedia article. There are so many terabytes of shit on the Internet, John A Davison’s contributions are simply lost in the noise.

    @Reed:

    Thanks! That is somewhat unlikely as it was for a pretty mundane reason, and not something that’s worth blogging about, least of all here.

    @Brock:

    Nope, this fella’s email came totally out of the blue, and our entire correspondence is above for all to see. I have no idea what he’s reading, but I’d be happy to take a guess at what he’s smoking…

  5. Psychodiva Says:

    Never heard of the bloke- must say I gave in and had a peek at the ‘weblog’ (is that old-fashioned or is it just me?) anyway- no posts since Feb 3rd and nothing whatsoever of interest to anybody apart from some obviously snippy complaining about Pharyngula in a very childish manner- seems to me that he is just trying to drum up business and see if anyone will bite - very childish- mm I have an overwhelming urge to stick my title and qualifications at the end of this- I will resist, I will resist!

  6. TW Says:

    He reminds me of a USENET loon called George Hammond. Well worth a look at some of his posts (where he “scientifically proves” the existence of God based on gravitational curvature…).

    You will laugh for weeks.

  7. nullifidian Says:

    @Psychodiva:

    He seems to have a tendency to start a new blog, post a single post, reply to himself ad nauseam, dump it and move on. I don’t expect his new blog to have anything more than that, either.

    He does also seem to want to try to garner as much attention as possible by trying to be controversial and abusive which, apparently, he is failing at.

    Sux2behim. :-)

    @TW:

    I had to do a Google search for this character. I chuckled, but I don’t know about laughing for weeks. I feel rather sad for him, actually, but time will tell. :-)

  8. TW Says:

    Read a dozen or so of his posts, try to make sense of the god = G_uv idea and eventually the pity gives way to laughter…

  9. nullifidian Says:

    @TW:

    I’ll have to take your word for it. :-)

  10. Ted Goas Says:

    Wow, that guy just doesn’t quit? I thought this stuff was supposed to be fun?

Leave a Reply

Not praying for (or on) you