<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What an anglican split means for secularism in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description>Not praying for (or on) you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: literarydeadkittens</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>literarydeadkittens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=458#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>And will this wonderful, right-wing arm of the Church be aligning itself with radical ultra-conservative private groups like those new nutcases CCFON? Given that they spawned from LCF I&#039;m concerned that they&#039;ll be bringing in religious laws using politicians and lawyers just as they do in America. 

Fun huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And will this wonderful, right-wing arm of the Church be aligning itself with radical ultra-conservative private groups like those new nutcases CCFON? Given that they spawned from LCF I&#8217;m concerned that they&#8217;ll be bringing in religious laws using politicians and lawyers just as they do in America. </p>
<p>Fun huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6764</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=458#comment-6764</guid>
		<description>While I  agree, on principle , I don&#039;t think that this split will  bring the CofE any closer to being disestablished. 

What it is doing is making the illiberal wing of the CofE more and more  confident.

On the other hand, these right-wing Christians include some  pretty scary fundamentalists, bent in taking over the international Anglican Communion.  And ,  another major religion shifting towards fundamentalism would really be a disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I  agree, on principle , I don&#8217;t think that this split will  bring the CofE any closer to being disestablished. </p>
<p>What it is doing is making the illiberal wing of the CofE more and more  confident.</p>
<p>On the other hand, these right-wing Christians include some  pretty scary fundamentalists, bent in taking over the international Anglican Communion.  And ,  another major religion shifting towards fundamentalism would really be a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsoup</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=458#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>That makes sense.  Certain traditions carry less weight if each sect has a differing belief on those tradition.  If that is the case, then they can&#039;t impose them on the rest because they don&#039;t agree in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense.  Certain traditions carry less weight if each sect has a differing belief on those tradition.  If that is the case, then they can&#8217;t impose them on the rest because they don&#8217;t agree in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=458#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>@bugsoup: While I agree that there will likely always be in-fighting within any church faction, I feel that if the anglican (and I mean that singular sect) were to be rent in two, they would have less pretext for maintaining their singular state-validated privileges.

My point is not to remove their influence (as citizens they have as much say in the running of this country as any of us entitled to vote) but to diminish their &lt;em&gt;inordinate&lt;/em&gt; influence of their institution over the rest of us merely by virtue of national tradition or faux argumentum ad populum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bugsoup: While I agree that there will likely always be in-fighting within any church faction, I feel that if the anglican (and I mean that singular sect) were to be rent in two, they would have less pretext for maintaining their singular state-validated privileges.</p>
<p>My point is not to remove their influence (as citizens they have as much say in the running of this country as any of us entitled to vote) but to diminish their <em>inordinate</em> influence of their institution over the rest of us merely by virtue of national tradition or faux argumentum ad populum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsoup</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2008/07/02/what-an-anglican-split-means-for-secularism-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=458#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>Ah, but you are forgetting that they will always fight together no matter how many factions they have split into.  I&#039;m not sure there will be a difference in power between a divided church and a unified church.  For the purposes of presenting to the public, they will always work together for the exact reasons you think it&#039;s good that they split.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but you are forgetting that they will always fight together no matter how many factions they have split into.  I&#8217;m not sure there will be a difference in power between a divided church and a unified church.  For the purposes of presenting to the public, they will always work together for the exact reasons you think it&#8217;s good that they split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
