Erm, whut?
Apparently this blog has been chosen (with 60 others) for an award: the “Holy Blasphemy BEST Atheist/Skeptic (sic) Site Award 2009″.
The donor of same doesn’t consider themselves an “Atheist” (sic) but does believe in astrology and the power of gemstones
.
I wonder how they feel qualified to judge sceptical or atheist web sites when they say things like:
I like talking to myself in the dark; hey, if these things are comforting to me, it would be irrational not to do them simply because they aren’t proven to ‘be effective’ (if it works for me…it’s effective.)
*boggle*
I wonder what the author makes of anti-wimmin astrological Moon-rape.
Edit: I realised that I didn’t link back to the original post. Mea culpa.
No other posts are likely to be like this.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tags: astrology, atheism, scepticism, web, WhiskyTangoFoxtrot, woo woo
Comments
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
1286One Responsehttp://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/16/erm-whut/Erm%2C+whut%3F2009-06-16+16%3A37%3A39nullifidian to “Erm, whut?”
Blogroll (UK)
Blogroll
- Adult Christianity
- An Apostate’s Chapel
- Atheist Ethicist
- Atheist Hussy
- Atheist Media
- Atheist Perspective
- Atheist Revolution
- Bad Astronomy
- BEEP! BEEP! IT’S ME.
- Black Sun Journal
- Bligbi
- Canterbuty Atheists
- Chicken Girl
- Daylight Atheism
- Deep Thoughts
- Dwindling in Unbelief
- evanescent
- Evolution Space
- Evolved and Rat/i/onal
- Five Public Opinions
- Friendly Atheist
- Geoff Arnold
- Happy Jihad’s House of Pancakes
- Homosecular Gaytheist [and friends]
- Honjii’s Harangues
- Humanist Dad
- Irreligiosity
- Kazim’s Korner
- lol god
- LOLgod
- Lord J-Bar For Democracy, Not Theocracy
- No More Hornets
- One Good Move
- Oz Atheist’s Weblog
- Pharyngula
- Pooflingers Anonymous
- Possummomma (aka, Atheist in a mini van)
- Religion *is* a problem
- Saint Gasoline
- Sandwalk
- Sean the Blogonaut (new URL)
- See Mike Draw
- Sexy Secularist!
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Splendid Elles
- Stuff God Hates
- Stupid Dinosaur Lies
- The Atheist Experience
- The Atheist Jew
- The Barefoot Bum
- The Flying Trilobite
- The Iron Chariot
- The Perplexed Observer
- The Religion Virus
- The Uncredible Hallq
- toomanytribbles
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- Velocity Inversion
- Way of the Mind
- Wrong In Their Mind Tanks
Good Stuff
- Atheist Blogs Aggregated
- Center for Inquiry
- Centre for Inquiry
- Does God Exist?
- Encyclopedia of Life
- Fundies Say The Darndest Things!
- God Checker
- Humanist Society of Scotland
- Iron Chariots
- James Randi Educational Foundation
- Michael Shermer
- New England Skeptical Society
- Pat Condell’s Godless Comedy
- Planet Atheism
- Planet Humanism
- Robert M Price
- Sam Harris
- Science/AAAS
- Talk.Origins
- The Brights
- The Official God FAQ
- The RDF
- The Reason Project
- The Rejection of Pascal’s Wager
- The Science Network
Petitions
Petitions (closed)
- [failed] Abolish Faith Schools (UK)
- [failed] Ban Promotion of Faith in State Schools
- [failed] End Faith Schools
- [failed] Rename The ‘Church’ of Scientology under section 32 of the Companies Act
- [failed] Secularise the UK
- [failed] Tax Churches
- [ignored] Refuse state funding of church maintenance
- [partial success] Ban the usage of Narconon in any publicly funded orgianisation
- [partial success] Stop Islamic Sharia Law being used in Great Britain
- [partial success] Stop misleading advertising by religious groups
- [success] Recognise Atheists
- [success] Remove Creationist Literature from State Schools
-
Twitter
-
Chat
Join nullifidian on IRC in #atheism at blitzed.org or use the chat right here
Or head on over to Secular Chat.
-
Feeds
-
Current readers
-
Recently played
-
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Tags
- activism
- advertising
- anti-atheism
- anti-science
- Arkell v. Pressdram
- atheism
- atheist bus
- bad arguments/logical fallacies
- BBC
- BBC News
- bible
- bigotry
- blasphemy
- blog
- books
- British Humanist Association
- cartoon
- catholicism
- Charles Darwin
- chart
- christianity
- Christian Voice
- creationism/intelligent design
- culture
- demotivation
- dogma
- Edinburgh
- education
- employment
- entertainment
- evidence
- evolution
- evolution denial
- FAIL!
- faith/belief
- free speech
- fundamentalism
- government and politics
- government and politics
- homophobia
- homosexuality
- humanism
- humour
- hypocrisy
- I demand respect!
- image
- islam
- Jerry Springer:The Opera
- legal
- letters
- literalism
- LOL
- lying for Jesus
- media
- medicine and healthcare
- medicine and healthcare
- Mohammed
- news
- nullifidian.net
- opinion
- persecution complex
- personal
- petition
- photo
- Photoshop
- prayer
- quote
- Ray "Tampon Case/Banana Man" Comfort
- reality
- religion
- response
- Richard Dawkins
- Sam Harris
- scepticism
- science
- Scotland
- scripture
- secularism
- special treatment/religious privilege
- special treatment/religious privilege
- Stephen "Birdshit" Green
- superstition
- taking the piss
- technology
- television
- the arts
- The Guardian
- The Independent
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- theocracy/anti-secularism
- The Stupid It Burns
- The Telegraph
- The Times
- thought
- UK
- USA
- video
- web
- WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
- woo woo
-
Archives
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006










Sure sure, I have attachments to silly beliefs that I continue to accept because they're comforting and structure my life, while at the same time I recognize that they may not be true. Is this less wise and than refusing absolutely anything that may not be true (ie. can't be proven)? And while I recognize your point – you can't be arguing that only 'insiders' should have the right to judge: this means that, only Christians for example, have the right to say anything at all about Christianity; and if you aren't in the club, you should keep your mouth shut. That's just plain ridiculous.