<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Petition: Withdraw support for creationist zoo in schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/</link>
	<description>Not praying for (or on) you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-8020</link>
		<dc:creator>nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=1304#comment-8020</guid>
		<description>Oh, yes, they&#039;re certainly creationists.  Which other zoo do you know has materials not just for science classes but for RE classes? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes, they&#039;re certainly creationists.  Which other zoo do you know has materials not just for science classes but for RE classes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-8019</link>
		<dc:creator>nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=1304#comment-8019</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to disagree with you somewhat, for two reasons: 
 
1) I&#039;ve often heard tell of non-adults (i.e. kids) actually becoming &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; sceptical in their outlook when they&#039;ve been exposed to  &lt;em&gt;certain&lt;/em&gt; unevidenced ideas (Santa, the tooth fairy, etc.)  I can&#039;t cite anything of the top of my head, but I do remember reading an argument about this somewhere (it was a surprise to me as I changed my mind from having quite a strict &quot;tell kids only the truth&quot; attitude); and 
 
2) some adults who act on their unevidenced beliefs (be it religion, CAM, whatever) I could not bring myself to consider &quot;responsible&quot;, especially (as you point out) when it comes to telling kids stuff. 
 
I think I see where you&#039;re coming from here, but I&#039;d prefer to keep my wording. 
 
With 1 above, I want to clarify that I don&#039;t think asserting or confirming batshit insanity to kids is a good idea, but being ambiguous (possibly in an evasive non-committal or answer-a-question-with-a-question way) might be a better way of allowing them to come to their own conclusions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m going to disagree with you somewhat, for two reasons: </p>
<p>1) I&#039;ve often heard tell of non-adults (i.e. kids) actually becoming <em>more</em> sceptical in their outlook when they&#039;ve been exposed to  <em>certain</em> unevidenced ideas (Santa, the tooth fairy, etc.)  I can&#039;t cite anything of the top of my head, but I do remember reading an argument about this somewhere (it was a surprise to me as I changed my mind from having quite a strict &quot;tell kids only the truth&quot; attitude); and </p>
<p>2) some adults who act on their unevidenced beliefs (be it religion, CAM, whatever) I could not bring myself to consider &quot;responsible&quot;, especially (as you point out) when it comes to telling kids stuff. </p>
<p>I think I see where you&#039;re coming from here, but I&#039;d prefer to keep my wording. </p>
<p>With 1 above, I want to clarify that I don&#039;t think asserting or confirming batshit insanity to kids is a good idea, but being ambiguous (possibly in an evasive non-committal or answer-a-question-with-a-question way) might be a better way of allowing them to come to their own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSJenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSJenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=1304#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>I too was initially hesitant about this petition, but the zoo&#039;s website clearly shows that it&#039;s aiming at kids (mentioning stuff specifically targeted to the National Curriculum). There&#039;s also blatantly creationist stuff on view at the website, and I don&#039;t trust them not to try infiltrating this into the materials they use at the zoo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was initially hesitant about this petition, but the zoo&#039;s website clearly shows that it&#039;s aiming at kids (mentioning stuff specifically targeted to the National Curriculum). There&#039;s also blatantly creationist stuff on view at the website, and I don&#039;t trust them not to try infiltrating this into the materials they use at the zoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Magellan</title>
		<link>http://www.nullifidian.net/2009/06/20/petition-withdraw-support-for-creationist-zoo-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-8017</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Magellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nullifidian.net/?p=1304#comment-8017</guid>
		<description>&quot;On one hand, I feel people should be able to believe any bat-shit insane proposition they like.&quot; 
 
Personally, I&#039;d modify that slightly: *Responsible adults* should be able to believe any bat-shit insane proposition they like. They shouldn&#039;t be able to impress batshit insane propositions onto impressionable young minds. So I&#039;d sign it for both reasons - though I agree that it&#039;s badly worded.  
 
Thanks for the heads-up.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;On one hand, I feel people should be able to believe any bat-shit insane proposition they like.&quot; </p>
<p>Personally, I&#039;d modify that slightly: *Responsible adults* should be able to believe any bat-shit insane proposition they like. They shouldn&#039;t be able to impress batshit insane propositions onto impressionable young minds. So I&#039;d sign it for both reasons &#8211; though I agree that it&#039;s badly worded.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
